Также здесь представлены профилактических мерах, актуальных подходах и рекомендациях специалистов.
However, if the same person were charged with section three hundred and 302, their defence that they never meant to eliminate the person – and that They only desired to injure them or incapacitate them –, will are unsuccessful, given that the elements with the offence only require the intent to cause injury being proven, not the intention to cause death.
This Court could interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding reached because of the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. Should the conclusion or finding is which include no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court might interfere with the conclusion or the finding and mildew the relief to make it correct on the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-enjoy the evidence or the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified with the decision in the Supreme Court inside the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
To report technical problems with our Website, please contact the webmaster. The webmaster will not reply to inquiries seeking legal tips or specific cases. Questions regarding specific cases should be directed to the court in which the case has been or will be filed.
“Making sure the accuracy of legal information is paramount,” says Barrister Ayesha Khan, a leading legal expert in Lahore. “Cross-referencing information from multiple highly regarded sources is essential for reliable legal research.”
Reasonable grounds are offered on the record to connect the petitioner with the commission on the alleged offence. Nevertheless punishment of the alleged offence does not drop inside the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. but figured out Deputy Prosecutor General apprises that another case of similar nature arising outside of FIR No. 1250/2024 dated 10.05.2024 registered under Section 489-F, PPC at Police Station Haji Pura, District Sialkot is during the credit from the petitioner as accused, therefore, case in the petitioner falls while in the exception where bail cannot be granted even during the cases not falling within the ambit of prohibition contained in Section 497, Cr.P.C. In this regard, advice is sought from the case of “Muhammad Imran versus The State and others” (PLD 2021 Supreme Court 903); relevant portion on the same is hereby reproduced:
Petitioner having been declared an absconder in this case for over one particular and a 50 % year generates the apprehension that the petitioner may perhaps avoid standing trial and therefore delay the prosecution from the case. The material on record makes the case of the petitioner falls under two exceptions to the rule of grant of bail as mentioned above.
Any court may perhaps request to distinguish the present case from that of the binding precedent, to reach a different conclusion. The validity of this type of distinction may or may not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to your higher court.
The prosecution presented substantial evidence, which include eyewitness testimonies and expert forensic analysis, confirming the copyright nature with the seized currency.
This public interest read more litigation came before the Supreme Court of Pakistan when petitioners challenged the construction of a nearby electricity grid station as a consequence of potential health risks and hazards.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
The latest amendment to this section signifies the legislature’s dedication to improving the effectiveness of your regulation in tackling contemporary challenges related to counterfeiting.
These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory law, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory legislation, which are set up by executive organizations based on statutes.